| |
ABSTRACT
A Meckel’s Diverticulum is a remnant vitello-intestinal duct
present in the embryo. It is the commonest congenital anomaly
of the GI tract being present in 2% of autopsies. This is a case of
an adult male patient presented with pain around the umbilical
region which later shifted to the right iliac fossa. In face of such
classical history and other signs and symptoms, clinical diagnosis
of Acute Appendicitis was made, but, intraoperatively it turned
out to be an inflamed Meckel’s Diverticulum.
From Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos Hospital, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman
Received:28 Oct 2009
Accepted: 29 Nov 2009
Address correspondence and reprint request to: Dr. Tahir Ali Chohan, Dept of Surgery,
Sultan Qaboos Hospital, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman.
E:mail: tahiralichohan@hotmail.com
|
|
| |
A Meckel’s diverticulum possesses all the three coats
of intestinal wall. It has the same microscopic structure as the adjacent small
bowel and it has a separate blood supply from the adjacent small bowel mesentery
(the omphalomesenteric artery).1 In 20% of the cases, the mucosa contains
heterotopic epithelium, namely gastric, colonic and sometimes pancreatic tissue.
Although Meckels diverticulum occurs with equal frequency in both sexes,
symptoms usually resulting from the epithelium contained in the diverticulum
predominantly occur in males.2 It is one of the differential diagnosis for Acute
Appendicitis and is usually discovered intraoperatively. However, sometimes the
presenting symptoms may be a guide to this suspected pathology. This report
presents a case of Meckel diverticulitis with symptoms and signs of Acute
Appendicitis.
CASE REPORT
A 27 yr old male patient was presented to Sultan Qaboos Hospital Accident and
Emergency Department with abdominal pain for the last four days. The pain was
colicky in nature and was associated with nausea and vomiting. It persisted
initially around the umbilicus for two days and later shifted to the right iliac
fossa on the third day. The patient also gave a history of associated
constipation, however there was no history of bleeding per rectum episodes. He
denied any surgical intervention before or any other medical illness. However,
he did visit a private clinic during this illness where he received some
analgesia. He had some relief but the pain recurred after a few hours.
Clinical examination revealed that vital signs were within normal limits. The
oral mucosa appeared dry, suggestive of dehydration. The abdomen was mildly
distended and the patient had a positive signs of
cough. There was tenderness and rebound tenderness in the right iliac fossa and
Rovsing’s sign was also found to be positive. However, there was no palpable
mass. Routine investigations were within normal limits and Urine routine
examination showed 4 wbc/HPF. Clinical diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis was made
and the patient was prepared for surgery. Pre-anesthesia consultation and
consent were obtained and the patient was posted for Laparoscopic Appendectomy.
Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed a mass in the right lower abdomen. It was
decided to convert the procedure to open and a grid iron incision was made in
the right iliac fossa. The mass was found to be a huge Meckel’s diverticulum
with a wide base (about 12cm) adherent to the small bowel mesentery by its apex
in the right iliac fossa causing a kink in the ileum. The appendix was also
explored and found to be retroceacal in position. It appeared healthy without
any signs of inflammation. The diverticulum was carefully released from
surrounding adhesions and a diverticulectomy was performed. The resultant
intestinal defect was primarily closed. Appendectomy was also performed and the
tissues were sent for histopathology. Postoperatively, the patient had an
uneventful recovery. Histopathology report revealed ulcerated ileal mucosa in
the Meckel’s Diverticulum with inflammation and hemorrhage in its wall. However,
no ectopic mucosa was detected in the diverticulum. Histopathology of the
Appendix was unremarkable.
Discussion
The majority of Meckel diverticulae are silent and are
discovered incidentally intraoperatively. However, they have been known to cause
severe hemorrhage, intussusception, diverticulitis, perforation, peptic
ulceration and intestinal obstruction. Small bowel obstruction is reported to be
the most common complication of Meckels diverticulum in adults and second most
common in children.3-6,7
The case described above presented
with signs and symptoms of Acute Appendicitis but was later discovered to be
Meckel’s Diverticulitis. This patient had partial intestinal obstruction due to
adhesions of the diverticulum with the ileal mesentery. Symptoms such as nausea,
vomiting and constipation can be varyingly present in patients of both Acute
Appendicitis and Meckel Diverticulitis. However, the “persistence of pain around
the umbilicus and its delayed shifting to right lower abdomen” must raise the
suspicion of Meckel’s Diverticulum. Abdominal Ultrasound and computed
tomography are reported in the literature to be valuable radiological
investigations in Meckel Diverticulitis patients without the classical history
of painless hemorrhage.8,9
The utility of Tc99m-pertechnetate scintigraphy in the diagnosis of ectopic
gastric mucosa is well established, particularly in the case of Meckel’s
diverticulum, despite substantial variation in the reported sensitivity.10
Laparoscopy is useful in
both diagnosis and treatment. Laparoscopic resection of Meckels diverticulum is
feasible and ideal particularly in specialized centers.11
Conclusion
The clinical diagnosis of inflamed Meckel’s
diverticulum is rarely considered preoperatively in adult patients.
12 This report highlights the fact that the
differential diagnosis of Meckel’s should always be kept in mind in cases
suspected of acute appendicitis, and particularly in adults with symptoms of
intestinal obstruction. Careful assessment of the symptoms such as duration of
pain and its delayed shifting to the right lower abdomen cannot be
over-emphasized. Furthermore, as a classical teaching, a normal looking Appendix
on surgery for Acute Appendicitis should always raise the suspicion of Meckel’s
Diverticulum.
Acknowledgements
The authors reported no conflict
of interest and no funding was received on this work.
References
1.Steele RJC. Disorders of the small intestine and vermiform appendix. In Cusheiri A, Steele RJC, Moosa AR. Essential Surgical Practice. 4th Edition. London: Arnold, 2002. p 567.
2.Jones O, Mortenson, JMC Neil. The small and large intestines. Russell RCG, Williams N S, Bulstrode CJK. Bailey & Love’s Short Practice of Surgery. 24th Edition. London: Arnold, 2004. p 1159.
3. Leijonmark CE, Bonman-Sandelin K, Frisell J, Raf L. Meckel’s diverticulum in the adult. Br J Surg 1986; 73:146-149.oNormal"
style="text-align:justify;line-height:normal;text-autospace:none;vertical-align:middle; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;">
4. Mackey WC, Dineen P. A fifty year experience with Meckel’s diverticulum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983; 156: 56-64.
5. Soltero MJ, Bill AH. The natural history of Meckel’s diverticulum and its relation to incidental removal. Am J Surg 1976; 132: 168-173.
6. Veith FJ, Botsford TW. Disease of Meckel’s diverticulum in adults. Am Surg 1962; 28: 674-677.
7. Palepu S. Axial Volvulus of a giant Meckel’s Diverticulum. Abd surgery 2007.
8. Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR. Imaging manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189:81-88.
9. Thurley PD, Halliday KE, Somers JM, Al-Daraji WI, Ilyas M, Broderick NJ. Radiological features of Meckel’s diverticulum and its complications. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:109-118.
10. Chan K.W. Perforation of Meckel’s Diverticulum caused by a chicken bone: case report. J Med Case reports 2009; 3:48.
11. Shalaby RY, Soliman SM, Fawy M, Samaha A. Laparoscopic management of Meckel’s diverticulum in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:562-567.
12. Diamond T, Gilliland R. Meckel’s diverticulum-too often forgotten in adults? The Ulster Med J 1987; 56:143-145.
|
|